Study programme 2023-2024 | Français | ||
Master Thesis | |||
Programme component of Master's in Computer Science (CHARLEROI) (shift schedule) à la Faculty of Science |
Code | Type | Head of UE | Department’s contact details | Teacher(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
US-M1-INFO60-010-C | Compulsory UE | BEN TAIEB Souhaib | S861 - Big Data and Machine Learning |
|
Language of instruction | Language of assessment | HT(*) | HTPE(*) | HTPS(*) | HR(*) | HD(*) | Credits | Weighting | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Français | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 19.00 | Full academic year |
AA Code | Teaching Activity (AA) | HT(*) | HTPE(*) | HTPS(*) | HR(*) | HD(*) | Term | Weighting |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S-INFO-065 | Master Thesis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | 100.00% |
Programme component |
---|
Objectives of Programme's Learning Outcomes
Learning Outcomes of UE
The master's thesis constitutes a research and/or development project in the field of computer science. This project is conducted within a university research laboratory or in the private sector, under the supervision of a mentor who proposes a thesis topic, guides the student in their approach, and provides advice. A thesis typically involves the following steps: an in-depth literature review on the topic, planning and conducting research and/or development activities, analyzing the results, and writing a document of a maximum length of 100 pages, excluding appendices. The presentation of the results follows the conventional structure in science, including an introduction, an objective, a description of methods and/or materials, presentation and discussion of results, conclusions, a list of bibliographic references, and appendices. During this work, the student acquires a range of skills, including the ability to independently analyze a problem and propose solutions, conduct experiments and interpret data, deepen their understanding of the scientific literature, and communicate abstract ideas and scientific results.
Evaluation is done based on the written report and the oral presentation. It takes into account the level of understanding of the subject, the quality of the written report, the oral presentation, and responses to questions during the oral defense.
UE Content: description and pedagogical relevance
Depending on the subject and the laboratory where the work is done.
Prior Experience
A general knowledge in computer science, as well as a specialisation in the domain covered by the master thesis' subject is required. A successful completion of the "Reading and Scientific Writing" course (US-MC-INFO60-014-C, AA S-INFO-050)
Type of Teaching Activity/Activities
AA | Type of Teaching Activity/Activities |
---|---|
S-INFO-065 |
|
Mode of delivery
AA | Mode of delivery |
---|---|
S-INFO-065 |
|
Required Learning Resources/Tools
AA | Required Learning Resources/Tools |
---|---|
S-INFO-065 | Not applicable |
Recommended Learning Resources/Tools
AA | Recommended Learning Resources/Tools |
---|---|
S-INFO-065 | Not applicable |
Other Recommended Reading
AA | Other Recommended Reading |
---|---|
S-INFO-065 | Not applicable |
Grade Deferrals of AAs from one year to the next
AA | Grade Deferrals of AAs from one year to the next |
---|---|
S-INFO-065 | Authorized |
Term 1 Assessment - type
AA | Type(s) and mode(s) of Q1 assessment |
---|---|
S-INFO-065 |
|
Term 1 Assessment - comments
AA | Term 1 Assessment - comments |
---|---|
S-INFO-065 | Not applicable |
Resit Assessment - Term 1 (B1BA1) - type
AA | Type(s) and mode(s) of Q1 resit assessment (BAB1) |
---|---|
S-INFO-065 |
|
Term 2 Assessment - type
AA | Type(s) and mode(s) of Q2 assessment |
---|---|
S-INFO-065 |
|
Term 2 Assessment - comments
AA | Term 2 Assessment - comments |
---|---|
S-INFO-065 | The written report is evaluated by a commitee constituted by the supervisor, the co-supervisor (if applicable), and at least two referees. One or more external referees, specialized in the subject, can make part of the commitee. The student also does a public oral presentation of 15min. This presentation is followed by a short questions/answers session (10min). In the event of proven plagiarism with aggravating circumstances of erroneous bibliographic referencing for the relevant part of the work, the grade for the teaching unit (i.e. educational component, EU) will be zero points out of twenty (0/20) and the case file will be forwarded to the deliberation jury to rule on the merits of further sanctions |
Term 3 Assessment - type
AA | Type(s) and mode(s) of Q3 assessment |
---|---|
S-INFO-065 |
|
Term 3 Assessment - comments
AA | Term 3 Assessment - comments |
---|---|
S-INFO-065 | The written report is evaluated by a commitee constituted by the supervisor, the co-supervisor (if applicable), and at least two referees. One or more external referees, specialized in the subject, can make part of the commitee. The student also does a public oral presentation of 15min. This presentation is followed by a short questions/answers session (10min). In the event of proven plagiarism with aggravating circumstances of erroneous bibliographic referencing for the relevant part of the work, the grade for the teaching unit (i.e. educational component, EU) will be zero points out of twenty (0/20) and the case file will be forwarded to the deliberation jury to rule on the merits of further sanctions |