Study programme 2024-2025Français
Méthodes d'entretien clinique approfondies
Programme component of Master's in Psychology (MONS) (day schedule) à la Faculty of Psychology and Education

CodeTypeHead of UE Department’s
contact details
Teacher(s)
UP-M1-MPSYCH-056-MCompulsory UEDENIS Jennifer
  • DENIS Jennifer
  • PICCALUGA Myriam

Language
of instruction
Language
of assessment
HT(*) HTPE(*) HTPS(*) HR(*) HD(*) CreditsWeighting Term
  • Français
Français201000055.001st term

AA CodeTeaching Activity (AA) HT(*) HTPE(*) HTPS(*) HR(*) HD(*) Term Weighting
P-SPCE-229Méthodes d'entretien clinique approfondies : Théorie100000Q1
P-SPCE-230Méthodes d'entretien clinique approfondies : Séminaire010000Q1
P-SMSL-241Communication, langage et psychologie clinique100000Q1

Overall mark : the assessments of each AA result in an overall mark for the UE.
Programme component

Objectives of Programme's Learning Outcomes

  • Analyse a situation (individually or collectively) in reference to theories and methodological approaches within psychology.
    • Master and appropriately mobilise knowledge and methodological approaches to understand and explain the normal/atypical/pathological functioning of individuals, groups or organisations.
    • Analyse and model a situation (individually or collectively) by critically selecting theories and methodological approaches.
  • Justifiably choose an intervention and implement and evaluate it.
    • Master knowledge on interventions to improve a given situation (individually or collectively), as well as implement them.
    • Critically analyse the extent and limitations of different types of intervention.
    • Develop a plan of intervention or management in a rigorous and justified manner, taking into account all relevant factors (including underlying issues and associated risks).
    • Implement intervention with reference to theoretical models of intervention, taking into account the constraints and resources in the situation encountered.
    • Appropriately apply different types of intervention.
    • Evaluate the intervention.
    • Alter the intervention.
  • Communicate and exchange information in a structured and adapted way to the intended purpose and relevant public.
    • Present and structure data in a clear, precise, neutral, and non-oriented way.
    • Present the results of a diagnostic evaluation (orally and in writing) and inform various representatives.
    • Write a report arguing over an intervention (including evaluation).
    • Appropriately use presentation materials.
  • Work effectively with different actors as part of a team or a network of professionals.
    • Implement the most effective ways of collaboration in a given situation.
    • Share knowledge and data to carry out a common project.
    • Listen to team members and partners. Encourage expressing a shared opinion. Accept and discuss a different point of view than theirs.
    • Identify professional networks, interact and collaborate with them, and research external expertise if necessary.
  • Act ethically and professionally.
    • Refer to ethical principles to define the framework of their professional practice.
    • Act in compliance with specific legislative frameworks and the code of conduct of Belgian psychologists.
    • Adopt professional attitudes (think critically, avoid prejudices, respect professional confidentiality, etc.).
    • If necessary, appeal to peers or other professionals of other disciplines or expertise.
  • Assess and pursue professional and personal development.
    • Monitor knowledge and methodological approaches in order to evolve their thinking and practice.
    • Learn from practice (based particularly on assessment). Question themselves.
    • Analyse their personal functioning and adapt their professional attitudes. Effectively manage their emotions.
    • Continue to train and improve their skills.
  • Master scientific research methods in psychology.
    • Collect data and analyse it qualitatively and quantitatively.

Learning Outcomes of UE

- Analyse a clinical situation (individual or collective) with reference to the theories, clinical and scientific approaches relevant to the conduct of a clinical interview.
- Choose a targeted intervention, justify it, implement it and evaluate it by critically analysing the scope of his/her professional actions.
- Detect the signs of verbal communication that lead to discomfort in the clinical setting
- Learn to adjust one's professional gestures according to specific clinical interview situations
- Communicate and exchange information in a structured way, adapted to the purpose and the public concerned.
- To work efficiently with different actors within a team or a network of professionals: to give oneself the means to collaborate and to act efficiently.
- To act in an ethical and deontological way: to refer to the legislative framework and the code of
code of ethics for psychologists, respect professional secrecy including shared secrecy.
- Evaluate and pursue professional and personal development: maintain a watchful eye in terms of knowledge and clinical approaches in order to develop one's thinking and practice.

 

UE Content: description and pedagogical relevance

- consideration of subjective experience
- first person approaches
- in-depth techniques specific to the conduct of clinical interviews (framing, reformulation, expansion techniques, etc.)
- Evaluating non-verbal communication and language issues
- Awareness of circular questioning and the development of clinical hypotheses
- Professional gestures to use in clinical interviews: complex cases 
- Developing a reflective view of one's clinical practice (reflection on and in action)
 

Prior Experience

Clinical interview course (Master 1)

Type(s) and mode(s) of Q1 UE assessment

  • Written examination - Face-to-face
  • Graded assignment(s) - Face-to-face

Q1 UE Assessment Comments

Written evaluation based on video extracts to be commented on in regards to the concepts developed in the 3 AA of the MECA EU

Method of calculating the overall mark for the Q1 UE assessment

Integrated exam (3AA)

Type(s) and mode(s) of Q1 UE resit assessment (BAB1)

  • Written examination - Face-to-face
  • Graded assignment(s) - Face-to-face

Q1 UE Resit Assessment Comments (BAB1)

Na

Method of calculating the overall mark for the Q1 UE resit assessment

NA

Type(s) and mode(s) of Q3 UE assessment

  • Written examination - Face-to-face
  • Graded assignment(s) - Face-to-face

Q3 UE Assessment Comments

NA

Method of calculating the overall mark for the Q3 UE assessment

NA

Type of Teaching Activity/Activities

AAType of Teaching Activity/Activities
P-SPCE-229
  • Cours magistraux
P-SPCE-230
  • Séminaires
P-SMSL-241
  • Cours magistraux

Mode of delivery

AAMode of delivery
P-SPCE-229
  • Face-to-face
P-SPCE-230
  • Face-to-face
P-SMSL-241
  • Hybrid

Required Learning Resources/Tools

AARequired Learning Resources/Tools
P-SPCE-229Not applicable
P-SPCE-230videos#newline# Articles
P-SMSL-241Moodle 

Recommended Learning Resources/Tools

AARecommended Learning Resources/Tools
P-SPCE-229Not applicable
P-SPCE-230Not applicable
P-SMSL-241Not applicable

Other Recommended Reading

AAOther Recommended Reading
P-SPCE-229Not applicable
P-SPCE-230Not applicable
P-SMSL-241Fast LA, Funder DC. Personality as manifest in word use: correlations with self-report, acquaintance report, and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;94(2):334-46. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.334.#newline# Mairesse, F. ,Walker, M.A., Mehl, M.R. and Moore R.K.( 2007). Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 30,(1),457-500.#newline# Pennebaker, J., King, L. (1999). Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference. Journal of personality and social psychology,  77, 1296-1312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296#newline# Pennebaker, J. W. ,Mehl, M. R., Niederhoffer, K. G.  (2003). Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves, Annual Review of Psychology,54,1, 547-577.  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041#newline# Yarkoni T. (2010). Personality in 100,000 Words: A large-scale analysis of personality and word use among bloggers. Journal of research in personality44(3), 363-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.04.001
(*) HT : Hours of theory - HTPE : Hours of in-class exercices - HTPS : hours of practical work - HD : HMiscellaneous time - HR : Hours of remedial classes. - Per. (Period), Y=Year, Q1=1st term et Q2=2nd term
Date de dernière mise à jour de la fiche ECTS par l'enseignant : 31/05/2024
Date de dernière génération automatique de la page : 07/09/2024
20, place du Parc, B7000 Mons - Belgique
Tél: +32 (0)65 373111
Courriel: info.mons@umons.ac.be