![]() | Study programme 2025-2026 | Français | |
![]() | Simulation exercise of an operational layout | ||
Programme component of Master's in Urban Design and Territorial Development (CHARLEROI) (day schedule) à la Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning |
| Code | Type | Head of UE | Department’s contact details | Teacher(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UA-M1-URBADT-126-C | Compulsory UE | MORITZ Benoit | EX22 - FAU - Intervenants extérieurs à la FAU |
|
| Language of instruction | Language of assessment | HT(*) | HTPE(*) | HTPS(*) | HR(*) | HD(*) | Credits | Weighting | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Français | 0 | 288 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12.00 | 2nd term |
| AA Code | Teaching Activity (AA) | HT(*) | HTPE(*) | HTPS(*) | HR(*) | HD(*) | Term | Weighting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-ULBC-160 | Simulation exercise of an operational layout | 0 | 288 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Q2 | 100.00% |
| Programme component |
|---|
Objectives of Programme's Learning Outcomes
Learning Outcomes of UE
At the end of the Operational Development Simulation Exercise, students will be able to perform the following tasks: - Analyse an urban planning tool such as a master plan or guide plan - Put the content of this tool into perspective in relation to its operational reality - Take a critical distance from the master plan or guide plan, objectifying the issues on the basis of well-founded criteria (land issues, financing, programming, legal aspects, etc.) - Compare an urban planning project currently being implemented with similar projects in Belgium or elsewhere in Belgium's neighbouring countries - Carry out a comparative case study and draw conclusions in relation to the case being simulated - Propose avenues for the feasibility of these scenarios (phasing, financing, stakeholders, programming, tools, urban forms, open spaces, etc.)
UE Content: description and pedagogical relevance
The proposed exercise consists of a professional scenario in which students take on the role of a public project owner responsible for implementing an existing master plan or urban development plan in a city in Wallonia or the Brussels-Capital Region. The aim is to translate the strategic intentions of the master plan into concrete actions, taking into account the institutional, regulatory and financial constraints specific to a public project owner. Students must analyse the structure of the master plan, understand its strategic and regulatory dimensions, describe the current phase of development and identify the obstacles to implementation, whether legal, technical, social, programmatic, financial or political. They are also required to propose realistic solutions and scenarios that are compatible with the responsibilities and resources of a public project owner. The course begins with a series of introductory presentations by stakeholders involved in the master plan or related topics, supplemented by one or more visits to similar projects in other Belgian cities. The students, divided into groups of five according to predefined themes, carry out a collective project structured in several stages: detailed description of the master plan, identification and analysis of obstacles, comparative analysis with other projects, formulation of possible solutions and development of implementation scenarios incorporating programming, phasing, economic and legal feasibility, urban locations and forms, as well as governance and coordination of stakeholders. The work takes the form of weekly seminars, with regular reports allowing for educational monitoring and the gradual development of analyses and proposals. Students must act as public project managers, which involves steering and coordinating the various aspects of the project, arbitrating between budgetary, regulatory and programmatic constraints, interacting with stakeholders – residents, developers, administrations, elected officials – and taking political and institutional issues into account in the implementation. This exercise draws on concepts covered in various Master's courses: representation, urban planning, economic and legal feasibility, environmental issues, and territorial governance. It serves as an exercise in synthesising acquired knowledge and applying it to a concrete situation. A roadmap provided by the instructor serves as a framework to guide the work and ensure consistency with expectations.
Prior Experience
Not applicable
Type of Teaching Activity/Activities
| AA | Type of Teaching Activity/Activities |
|---|---|
| A-ULBC-160 |
|
Mode of delivery
| AA | Mode of delivery |
|---|---|
| A-ULBC-160 |
|
Required Learning Resources/Tools
| AA | Required Learning Resources/Tools |
|---|---|
| A-ULBC-160 | Not applicable |
Recommended Learning Resources/Tools
| AA | Recommended Learning Resources/Tools |
|---|---|
| A-ULBC-160 | Not applicable |
Other Recommended Reading
| AA | Other Recommended Reading |
|---|---|
| A-ULBC-160 | Not applicable |
Grade Deferrals of AAs from one year to the next
| AA | Grade Deferrals of AAs from one year to the next |
|---|---|
| A-ULBC-160 | Authorized |
Term 2 Assessment - type
| AA | Type(s) and mode(s) of Q2 assessment |
|---|---|
| A-ULBC-160 |
|
Term 2 Assessment - comments
| AA | Term 2 Assessment - comments |
|---|---|
| A-ULBC-160 | The final presentation will take place before a panel composed of the course lecturer, another Master's programme lecturer and, where applicable, an external guest speaker. The assessment is broken down as follows: • 25% of the mark is awarded for the quality of the final oral presentation; • 75% of the mark is based on the quality and relevance of the written assignment submitted. |
Term 3 Assessment - type
| AA | Type(s) and mode(s) of Q3 assessment |
|---|---|
| A-ULBC-160 |
|
Term 3 Assessment - comments
| AA | Term 3 Assessment - comments |
|---|---|
| A-ULBC-160 | Not applicable |
Q3 UE Assessment
No assessment is planned in Q3 for this UE
Q3 AA Assessment
| AA | Q3 AA Assessment |
|---|---|
| A-ULBC-160 | No assessment is planned in Q3 for this AA |