![]() | Study programme 2025-2026 | Français | |
![]() | Multidisciplinary project 3 | ||
Programme component of Bachelor's in Engineering (CHARLEROI) (day schedule) à la Faculty of Engineering |
| Code | Type | Head of UE | Department’s contact details | Teacher(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UI-B3-IRCIVI-006-C | Compulsory UE | DE GREVE Zacharie | F101 - Génie Electrique |
|
| Language of instruction | Language of assessment | HT(*) | HTPE(*) | HTPS(*) | HR(*) | HD(*) | Credits | Weighting | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Français | 0 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6.00 | 2nd term |
| AA Code | Teaching Activity (AA) | HT(*) | HTPE(*) | HTPS(*) | HR(*) | HD(*) | Term | Weighting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-POLY-013 | Multidisciplinary project 3 | 0 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Q2 | 100.00% |
| Programme component |
|---|
Objectives of Programme's Learning Outcomes
Learning Outcomes of UE
Act as an engineer to propose a practical solution to a multidisciplinary and integrated problem in the field of engineering sciences, work efficiently as part of a team, respect deadlines, organise the time in the framework of a long term project, communicate project results
UE Content: description and pedagogical relevance
Objectives
* Studying a multidisiplinary problem linked with the learning modules proposed in BAB3. Students work by groups and choose a topic in a project list supplied by Poly(tech Mons and ULB academics (i.e. the project supervisors)
* Typical deliverables:
Hardware or software prototype, feasibility study, etc.
Written report (a final report and an intermediate one)
Oral presentation
Organisation
* Meetings with project supervisors on demand
* Mandatory Formal meetings scheduled during the semester with a Project Advisory Board (3 to 4 checkpoints in general). Non-justified absence automatically leads to exclusion from the final evaluation. These intermediate evaluations are not graded and only serve as follow-up points and feedback moments.
* Intermediate report submitted via Moodle mid-semester. This report is not evaluated and is formative, but the Advisory Board may apply a penalty on the final marks if that intermediate report is not prepared seriously.
Prior Experience
Not applicable
Type of Teaching Activity/Activities
| AA | Type of Teaching Activity/Activities |
|---|---|
| I-POLY-013 |
|
Mode of delivery
| AA | Mode of delivery |
|---|---|
| I-POLY-013 |
|
Required Learning Resources/Tools
| AA | Required Learning Resources/Tools |
|---|---|
| I-POLY-013 | Not applicable |
Recommended Learning Resources/Tools
| AA | Recommended Learning Resources/Tools |
|---|---|
| I-POLY-013 | Not applicable |
Other Recommended Reading
| AA | Other Recommended Reading |
|---|---|
| I-POLY-013 | Not applicable |
Grade Deferrals of AAs from one year to the next
| AA | Grade Deferrals of AAs from one year to the next |
|---|---|
| I-POLY-013 | Authorized |
Term 2 Assessment - type
| AA | Type(s) and mode(s) of Q2 assessment |
|---|---|
| I-POLY-013 |
|
Term 2 Assessment - comments
| AA | Term 2 Assessment - comments |
|---|---|
| I-POLY-013 | The valuation comprises three components: * A written report, to submit via Moodle in electronic format by the deadline specified at the beginning of the semester (25% of the total marks) * An oral defense (power point presentation with live demonstration of the developens d prototype if relevant), organised during the June session (25% of the total marks) * Appreciation by the supervisors of the quality and rigour of the students' work tduring the semester, as well as the quality of the deliverables (50% of the total marks) If the marks for one of the three components is less than or equal to 08/20, the Project Advisory Board may apply that insufficient note to the whole Learning Activity, with a possible re-evaluation (of the whole activity or of the components to be improved, to be decided by the Advisory Board) during the Q3. |
Term 3 Assessment - type
| AA | Type(s) and mode(s) of Q3 assessment |
|---|---|
| I-POLY-013 |
|
Term 3 Assessment - comments
| AA | Term 3 Assessment - comments |
|---|---|
| I-POLY-013 | The project may be evaluated again during the Q3 of the same Academic year, if proposed by the Project Advisory Board at the end of Q2, upon revision of the presentation and/or the written report and-or the project prototype. The Q3 evaluation will concern the modified deliverables and the accomplished work, following the same principles than in Q2. If, by the the end of Q2, the Project Advosory Board proposes the preparation of a completely new project, the latter will be realized during the following Academic year. |